![]() |
||
Omalizumab Plus Rush Immunotherapy (RIT) Is More Effective Than RIT Alone In Preventing Ragweed-Induced Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) Symptoms JN Kline1 , TB Casale2, WW Busse3, ZK Ballas1, M Mokhtarani4, C Bromstead4, V Seyfert-
Margolis5, A. Asare5, K Bateman6, MH Moss3, RG Townley2
Methods: Adult patients with positive history and skin test for ragweed sensitivity were enrolled in a double-blinded, parallel group, 3-center, placebo-controlled trial. Patients received either 9 weeks of omalizumab (0.016 mg/kg/IgE [IU/ml] /mo) or placebo, followed by 1 day RIT (1.2 - 4.0 mcg ambA1) or placebo RIT followed by 12 weeks of dual therapy (omalizumab plus IT or placebo plus IT). Primary endpoint was average daily allergy severity score, average of scores for nasal congestion/stuffiness; sneezing; itchy nose, throat and palate; itchy, watery eyes; and rhinorrhea, 0 – 3 scale. Results: One hundred fifty-nine patients were randomized, and 123 completed all treatments (per protocol, PP patients). Ragweed-specific IgG levels increased > 10-fold in the RIT groups. In the ITT population, average daily allergy severity score was significantly better in the omalizumab plus IT group (0.68) versus IT alone (0.84), p=0.033. In the PP population, allergy severity score AUC was significantly lower in the omalizumab plus IT group, 25.78, versus IT alone, 37.29, p=0.02. In the PP population, mean average daily severity scores were least in the omalizumab plus IT group, 0.58, versus 0.84 IT alone (p=0.01); 0.86, omalizumab alone (p=0.034) and 0.94, placebo (p=0.034). Conclusion: Omalizumab plus IT is a more effective treatment for SAR than IT alone.
|
||